Lovable vs Bolt: Speed vs code access. Neither gives you SEO.
Lovable builds polished UIs fast. Bolt lets you see and edit the code. But both produce React SPAs invisible to Google.
Quick Verdict
Both produce client-side rendered React apps that search engines can't crawl. Googlebot receives <div id="root"></div> from both platforms. No headings. No paragraphs. No meta descriptions. No crawlable links. If you need organic traffic, the builder you choose between these two doesn't matter — neither will get you there.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Lovable | Bolt |
|---|---|---|
| Design polish | Stronger — curated, consistent UI | Good — depends on prompts |
| Code access | GitHub export available | Full visibility — edit in browser |
| SEO crawlability | No — client-side rendered SPA | No — client-side rendered SPA |
| Google reads content | No — empty <div id="root"> | No — empty <div id="root"> |
| GitHub integration | Yes — built-in sync | Yes — export to GitHub |
| Backend approach | Supabase (tightly integrated) | Flexible — choose your own |
| Social share previews | Broken — crawlers can't read OG tags from JS | Broken — crawlers can't read OG tags from JS |
| Meta tags per page | Same fallback index.html for every route | Same fallback index.html for every route |
| Build speed | Fast — prompt to deploy in minutes | Fast — prompt to deploy in minutes |
| Target audience | Non-technical founders, designers | Developers, technical users |
| Pricing | Free tier + paid plans from $20/mo | Free tier + paid plans from $20/mo |
What They Have in Common
Lovable and Bolt look different on the surface, but under the hood they produce the same type of output: a React application bundled with Vite and rendered entirely in the browser.
- Both generate React + Vite single-page applications
- Both use client-side rendering — content is built by JavaScript after the page loads
- Both serve empty HTML to search engine crawlers
- Both share the same index.html shell across every route
- Both break Open Graph and Twitter Card previews for social sharing
- Both use JavaScript-based routing instead of real <a href> links
This is what Google receives from either platform:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8" />
<title>Vite + React + TS</title>
</head>
<body>
<div id="root"></div>
<script type="module" src="/src/main.tsx"></script>
</body>
</html>
No headings. No text content. No page-specific meta tags. No crawlable links. Googlebot makes an HTTP request, receives this empty shell, and moves on. The content only exists after JavaScript executes in a browser — something search engine crawlers don't reliably do.
Choosing Between Them
If SEO is not a factor, both platforms have legitimate strengths. Your choice depends on your background and how much control you want over the code.
Choose Lovable if...
- You're a non-technical founder or designer
- You want polished UI with minimal prompting
- You prefer a managed backend with Supabase
- You value speed-to-deploy over code control
Choose Bolt if...
- You're a developer who wants to see every line
- You want to choose your own backend and APIs
- You plan to customize beyond what prompts allow
- You want full code visibility in the browser
But if you need Google traffic, the choice between Lovable and Bolt is irrelevant. Both produce client-side rendered SPAs that search engines cannot crawl. You will need a conversion step regardless of which platform you build on.
Built on Lovable or Bolt? Get crawlable HTML either way.
We convert your AI-built React app into static HTML files. Same design. Real SEO. Files you own forever.
Get Your Free SEO AssessmentNo credit card. No obligation.